The week at Retraction Observe featured:
Our record of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up to 236. There are more than 34,000 retractions in our database — which powers retraction alerts in EndNote, LibKey, Papers, and Zotero. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our listing of top 10 most extremely cited retracted papers?
Here’s what was taking place somewhere else (some of these merchandise may perhaps be paywalled, metered access, or require absolutely free registration to go through):
- “Over-possessive students could resort to foul enjoy to guard their research domains, say postdocs.”
- “If there is a one point at which a little little bit of leverage utilized now could yield the major impression on bettering rigor and science, it would be at the level of journal editors.”
- “How Science Fuels a Lifestyle of Misinformation.”
- “[O]nly 30 preprints ended up affiliated with downstream retractions. This signifies .03% of all preprints with joined journal articles or blog posts on these servers.”
- Yet another retraction for a psychology researcher who scientific tests aggressive behavior. Joe Hilgard, who flagged the issues in 2019, points out.
- “Finally, the outcomes also act as a reminder that all science is provisional—not just preprints—and that several journalists look to acknowledge and connect this to their audiences.”
- “This application aids scientists take a look at ethical dilemmas.”
- “Identifying and taking care of problematic trials: a Investigation Integrity Assessment (RIA) instrument for randomized managed trials in evidence synthesis.”
- “Over the decades foremost up to his termination, interviews and University files display that he faced accusations of failure to execute work tasks, hostile behavior toward colleagues, and plagiarism.”
- “Another Stinker at the Journal of Finance.”
- A contact for much more retractions by prolific fraudster Joachim Boldt. And the editors answer.
- Two Penn students have papers retracted.
- “Research integrity instruction ‘a box-ticking workout.’”
- “Perceptions of publication pressure amid Hungarian researchers: Distinctions across occupation phase, gender, and scientific area.”
- “Publishing in probably predatory journals: Do universities undertake university leaders’ dishonest behavior?”
- “When are researchers allowed to be funny?”
- “Japan launches preprint server — but will researchers use it?”
- “What does Elsevier know about you, and how?”
- A professor sues a pupil for defamation soon after misconduct claims.
- “Funding: end ‘publish or perish’ for postdocs.”
- “It was tough to confirm that the researchers’ perform was intentional, but their comprehending of publication ethics has been deemed insufficient.”
- “China strategies sweeping makeover of academic journals to raise the profile and influence of domestic scientific exploration.”
- “Many researchers were being not compliant with their published info sharing statement: combined-techniques review.”
- “This cross-sectional study implies that knowledge sharing tactics are uncommon in surgical journals…”
- “Furthermore, a database with open, dynamically current, and computerized alerting properties crafted by multi-agents, for illustration, the Retraction Look at, should really be placed on the agenda.”
- “Fill in the Blank Leads to Much more Citations.”
- How typically exploration on humans comes about without having ethics approval.
- “Liverpool MP phone calls for retraction of Champions League last ‘smears.’”
- “Bay Location female paid out to generate county record reserve reportedly plagiarized from Wikipedia, SF news retailers.”
Like Retraction Look at? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to guidance our perform, follow us on Twitter, like us on Fb, include us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our day by day digest. If you discover a retraction that’s not in our database, you can permit us know in this article. For reviews or feed-back, electronic mail us at [email protected].