Diabetes education lowers health care costs, improves health care utilization

January 12, 2022

2 min read


Disclosures:
Bzowyckyj reports serving as an advisory board member for Sanofi. Please see the study for all other authors’ relevant financial disclosures.


We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Diabetes self-management education and support interventions might help reduce health care costs and improve utilization, but evidence varies across studies, according to findings from a systematic review.

“Diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) interventions may positively impact economic and health care utilization outcomes — meaning costs related to inpatient admissions, emergency department utilization and total costs of care tended to be lower for people with diabetes who received DSMES services than individuals who did not,” Andrew S. Bzowyckyj, PharmD, BCPS, CDCES, associate professor of pharmacy practice at Pacific University Oregon School of Pharmacy and clinic pharmacist at Legacy Medical Group, told Healio. “Unfortunately, a consistent pattern was not observed across all of the studies, so we cannot make any definitive assertions, but the general trajectory of the data points toward positively favoring DSMES from an economic overall cost of care perspective.”



Bzowyckyj is an associate professor of pharmacy practice at Pacific University Oregon School of Pharmacy and clinic pharmacist at Legacy Medical Group.

Bzowyckyj and colleagues conducted a systematic review of studies on economic and health utilization outcomes following DSMES interventions in the U.S. published from 2006 to May 5, 2020. All interventions had at least one element of the ADCES7 Self-Care Behaviors from the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists (ADCES). Economic costs and health care utilization outcomes were extracted from each study. Total costs were defined using each article’s definition of total cost; other costs and utilization included outpatient care, pharmacy costs, physician visits, medical claims and medication or supply costs; inpatient utilization included hospital utilization, hospital days, readmission, hospitalization rates and inpatient costs; and ED utilization included visits, costs or utilization rates for the ED.

The findings were published in The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care.

There were 22 articles included in the review with a total of 655,605 participants. There were eight quasi-experimental studies, seven randomized controlled trials, five cohort studies and one case-control study included. Eleven studies included adults with type 2 diabetes, five included participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and five did not report diabetes type.

Four studies reported a decrease in inpatient utilization or costs, four reported a decrease in outpatient medical costs, three reported a decrease in ED utilization and one reported a decrease in pharmacy claims and costs after DSMES interventions. Outpatient costs increased in one study with a commercially insured cohort, and three studies reported an increase in pharmacy costs. Total costs decreased in four studies and increased in two.

Fourteen studies included all seven components of the ADCES7 Self-Care Behaviors. Of those 14 studies, seven reported decreases in costs and utilization, one reported an increase in costs and utilization, and associations were unclear in six.

Bzowyckyj said there were several reasons the studies had a large amount of heterogeneity, including the variety of intervention types, the diverse patient populations, availability of data, varying durations of the interventions, and differences in which economic outcomes were measured. He said those variables make it imperative for further studies to be conducted.

“As the U.S. health care system continues to shift away from strictly fee-for-service models and more toward value-based programs, it is imperative to conduct formal health economic analyses to evaluate the impact of DSMES on all aspects of the quadruple aim —lower cost, better health, improved patient satisfaction and improved provider satisfaction,” Bzowyckyj said. “These studies should clearly include the details of their specific DSMES intervention, including how each ADCES7 component was addressed.”

Bzowyckyj added that research teams should include a diabetes care and education specialist to improve the utility of the studies.

For more information:

Andrew S. Bzowyckyj, PharmD, BCPS, CDCES, can be reached at bzowyckyj@pacificu.edu.

Stefani

Next Post

Viewpoint: Train Philosophy of Science in Significant University

Fri Jan 21 , 2022
“Evacuate the city. The latest quantities from the predictive design exhibit that the hurricane might strike in two times and result in important devastation.” This was not the well balanced tactic of an emergency manager, a town council member, or a meteorologist. Alternatively, it was the perception of a ninth […]
Exit mobile version